Argumentative Paragraph Topics For DC DebateIn the United States, the state of law in our nation's capital seems to make the most argumentative paragraph topics possible. Washington DC is home to the one of the most heated Congressional debate that takes place on a daily basis. However, with an ever-increasing audience of viewers and listeners to these debates, the use of topic debate has increased exponentially.
One particular topic to the conversation around DC debate as a whole is the question of the importance of precedent. Some of the more vocal members of Congress don't seem to understand the significance of precedent when it comes to whether or not certain legislation is allowed to pass. For example, many conservatives in Congress view that the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is the supreme court ruling that overriding laws that prohibited large donations to political campaigns by corporations and unions.
This has drawn the ire of many conservative politicians, such as former Texas Congressman Rick Perry, who thought the decision was unconstitutional. But, many others believe that the decision was a 'clear case' where the decision was in the area of political speech, which is why it is not considered to be a ruling by the Supreme Court.
In this political issue, many argue that there are some things that the Congress of the United States cannot decide, such as what the best rules of the road for the Federal Election Commission are. These are political issues that are not binding on the President and his decision making, but are decided by the State Legislatures in the States. For those individuals in the Congress that are more liberal, they also feel that the lower courts should also have a say in the interpretation of the Constitution, which makes the court's an important part of the process.
For example, this has been a topic of debate for some conservative state legislator. Many see that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the constitutionality of any decision made by the Judicial branch of government. But, the two branches of government are not the same, and the Supreme Court has two votes, while the other branches each have one vote.
It was also the topic of some political discussion when Ronald Reagan was in office. He believed that one branch of government could have more influence than another branch of government. For example, if there was one branch of government that did not need to abide by the decision of the other branches of government, then that branch of government could override the decisions made by the other branches of government.
As you can see, this argument is a political article that can help educate those individuals in the Congress and the American People about the different topics surrounding these Washington DC debate topics. The first thing to consider is that the Founding Fathers created this Constitutional Republic. We were given the authority by the people to govern ourselves and therefore our rights, not the power to decide the fate of these debate topics.